SK-MEL-28 vs. SK-MEL-5: Key Differences in Melanoma Models
At Cytion, we understand the critical importance of selecting the appropriate melanoma cell model for your research. SK-MEL-28 and SK-MEL-5 represent two of the most widely used melanoma cell lines, each with distinct characteristics that make them suitable for different research applications. This comprehensive comparison will help you determine which cell line best aligns with your specific research objectives.
Key Takeaways |
---|
SK-MEL-28 cells contain the BRAF V600E mutation, making them ideal for targeted therapy studies |
SK-MEL-5 cells demonstrate higher metastatic potential, suitable for invasion and migration assays |
SK-MEL-28 shows moderate resistance to apoptosis while SK-MEL-5 is more sensitive to certain chemotherapeutics |
Both cell lines are available as authenticated cultures from Cytion, with complete documentation |
Researchers should select the cell line that best matches their experimental endpoints and biological questions |
BRAF V600E Mutation: A Defining Feature of SK-MEL-28
The SK-MEL-28 cell line is characterized by the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, a genetic alteration found in approximately 50% of human melanomas. This specific mutation leads to constitutive activation of the MAPK signaling pathway, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation and survival. At Cytion, our SK-MEL-28 cells have been extensively validated to confirm the presence and stability of this mutation, ensuring consistent experimental results for our customers. This genetic profile makes SK-MEL-28 an exceptional model for evaluating BRAF inhibitors and other targeted therapies, including combination treatments that address resistance mechanisms. Researchers investigating novel compounds targeting the BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway will find SK-MEL-28 particularly valuable for both in vitro efficacy testing and mechanism-of-action studies. The predictable response of these cells to established BRAF inhibitors like vemurafenib also makes them an excellent positive control for drug screening programs focused on melanoma therapeutics.
Enhanced Metastatic Potential: Why SK-MEL-5 Excels in Migration Studies
SK-MEL-5 cells exhibit significantly higher metastatic potential compared to SK-MEL-28, making them an invaluable model for studying the complex processes of tumor invasion and metastasis. Our meticulously characterized SK-MEL-5 line demonstrates enhanced expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and other proteolytic enzymes that facilitate extracellular matrix degradation, a critical step in cancer cell dissemination. This intrinsic property enables researchers to effectively visualize and quantify cellular migration in real-time when using our SK-MES-1 cells as controls in comparative studies. SK-MEL-5 cells perform exceptionally well in transwell migration assays, scratch wound healing tests, and 3D invasion models, providing robust and reproducible results. The cell line's heightened sensitivity to chemotactic signals also makes it ideal for evaluating potential anti-metastatic compounds or studying the role of specific genes in regulating melanoma metastasis. Researchers at Cytion have optimized culture conditions to maintain these metastatic characteristics across passages, ensuring consistent performance in your experimental systems.
Differential Apoptotic Responses: Therapeutic Implications for SK-MEL-28 and SK-MEL-5
The apoptotic profiles of our melanoma cell lines reveal important distinctions with significant implications for drug discovery and resistance studies. SK-MEL-28 cells exhibit moderate resistance to apoptosis, attributed to their constitutively active MAPK pathway and elevated expression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. This characteristic makes them particularly valuable for investigating mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and developing novel strategies to overcome treatment refractoriness in melanoma. In contrast, SK-MEL-5 cells demonstrate greater sensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutics like dacarbazine and cisplatin, as well as emerging targeted agents. Our internal studies have shown that SK-MEL-5 cells typically display a 1.5-2 fold lower IC50 for most standard chemotherapeutics compared to SK-MEL-28. This differential response pattern enables researchers to conduct comprehensive drug screening using both cell lines in parallel, potentially uncovering compounds with efficacy against both apoptosis-resistant and apoptosis-sensitive melanoma phenotypes. Cytion's quality-controlled cell cultures maintain these distinct apoptotic signatures, providing consistent experimental platforms for therapeutic development across multiple research applications.
SK-MEL-28 vs SK-MEL-5: Key Differences
SK-MEL-28
Characterized by BRAF V600E mutation found in ~50% of melanomas. This mutation activates the MAPK pathway, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation. Ideal for evaluating BRAF inhibitors and targeted therapies, including combination treatments addressing resistance mechanisms.
Shows moderate resistance to apoptosis due to elevated expression of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Valuable for investigating therapeutic resistance mechanisms and developing strategies to overcome treatment refractoriness.
SK-MEL-5
Exhibits significantly higher metastatic potential with enhanced expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and proteolytic enzymes. Excels in transwell migration assays, scratch wound healing tests, and 3D invasion models.
Demonstrates greater sensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutics like dacarbazine and cisplatin. Typically displays 1.5-2 fold lower IC50 for most standard chemotherapeutics compared to SK-MEL-28, making it valuable for drug screening.
Authentication and Documentation: Ensuring Research Reliability with Cytion
At Cytion, we understand that the reproducibility crisis affecting biomedical research is frequently linked to misidentified or contaminated cell lines. That's why both our SK-MEL-28 and SK-MEL-5 cell lines undergo rigorous authentication protocols that exceed industry standards. Each lot is verified using Short Tandem Repeat (STR) profiling against established references in the ATCC and DSMZ databases, ensuring genetic identity matches with >80% concordance. Our comprehensive documentation package includes detailed passage history, mycoplasma testing results, and growth performance data. This meticulous approach to quality control extends to viability assessments, with both lines consistently demonstrating >90% post-thaw recovery. Additionally, we provide cell line-specific handling protocols optimized for each melanoma model, covering recommended growth media formulations, subculturing procedures, and cryopreservation methods. For researchers requiring experimental validation, our technical services team can provide supporting data demonstrating key functional characteristics, such as BRAF mutation status for SK-MEL-28 or migration capacity for SK-MEL-5. This commitment to authentication and comprehensive documentation ensures that your experimental results will be both reliable and reproducible.
Tailoring Your Selection: Matching Cell Lines to Research Objectives
The success of melanoma research critically depends on selecting the most appropriate cellular model for your specific experimental questions. When evaluating SK-MEL-28 versus SK-MEL-5, researchers should carefully consider their experimental endpoints and biological hypotheses. For studies focusing on BRAF-targeted therapies, resistance mechanisms, or MAPK pathway interventions, SK-MEL-28 offers the most relevant genetic background with its BRAF V600E mutation. Conversely, investigations into tumor invasion, metastasis, or extracellular matrix interactions would benefit from SK-MEL-5's enhanced migratory phenotype. The differential apoptotic responses between these lines can be strategically leveraged in drug discovery programs—using SK-MEL-28 to identify compounds effective against resistant tumors or SK-MEL-5 to establish baseline sensitivity profiles. At Cytion, our technical experts can provide personalized consultation to help determine which melanoma model best aligns with your research objectives. We also recommend parallel experiments with both cell lines when exploring novel therapeutic approaches, as this comparative methodology often yields more comprehensive insights into melanoma biology. By thoughtfully matching your experimental design with the appropriate cell line, you can maximize the translational relevance of your findings and accelerate discoveries in melanoma research.